Criticism of the National Health Service (England)
페이지 정보
작성자 Laurel 댓글 0건 조회 320회 작성일 25-07-04 23:45본문

Criticism of the National Health Service (England) consists of concerns such as access, waiting lists, healthcare coverage, and various scandals. The National Health Service (NHS) is the openly funded health care system of England, created under the National Health Service Act 1946 by the post-war Labour government of Clement Attlee. It has actually come under much criticism, particularly during the early 2000s, due to break outs of antibiotic resistant infections such as MRSA and Clostridioides difficile infection, waiting lists, and medical scandals such as the Alder Hey organs scandal. However, the participation of the NHS in scandals extends back several years, including over the arrangement of psychological healthcare in the 1970s and 1980s (eventually part of the reason for the Mental Health Act 1983), and overspends on medical facility newbuilds, including Guy's Hospital Phase III in London in 1985, the expense of which shot up from ₤ 29 million to ₤ 152 million. [1]
Access controls and waiting lists
In making health care a mainly "unnoticeable cost" to the client, health care seems to be efficiently free to its consumers - there is no particular NHS tax or levy. To decrease costs and ensure that everyone is dealt with equitably, there are a range of "gatekeepers." The family doctor (GP) functions as a primary gatekeeper - without a referral from a GP, it is typically impossible to get greater courses of treatment, such as a visit with a consultant. These are argued to be essential - Welshman Bevan kept in mind in a 1948 speech in your home of Commons, "we shall never ever have all we need ... expectations will always exceed capacity". [2] On the other hand, the national medical insurance systems in other countries (e.g. Germany) have actually ignored the requirement for referral; direct access to a professional is possible there. [3]
There has been concern about opportunistic "health travelers" travelling to Britain (primarily London) and using the NHS while paying absolutely nothing. [4] British citizens have actually been known to take a trip to other European nations to make the most of lower expenses, and since of a worry of hospital-acquired extremely bugs and long waiting lists. [5]
NHS access is for that reason controlled by medical priority rather than price mechanism, resulting in waiting lists for both assessments and surgical treatment, approximately months long, although the Labour government of 1997-onwards made it one of its crucial targets to reduce waiting lists. In 1997, the waiting time for a non-urgent operation might be two years; there were aspirations to decrease it to 18 weeks in spite of opposition from medical professionals. [6] It is objected to that this system is fairer - if a medical problem is intense and dangerous, a client will reach the front of the queue rapidly.
The NHS measures medical requirement in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), a technique of measuring the benefit of medical intervention. [7] It is argued that this approach of designating healthcare indicates some clients should lose out in order for others to gain, and that QALY is a of making life and death decisions. [8]
Hospital got infections
There have been numerous fatal break outs of antibiotic resistant bacteria (" super bugs") in NHS healthcare facilities, such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus and Clostridioides difficile infection. [9] This has resulted in criticism of standards of health throughout the NHS, with some clients buying private medical insurance or travelling abroad to avoid the perceived risk of capturing a "super bug" while in healthcare facility. However, the department of health promised ₤ 50 million for a "deep tidy" of all NHS England healthcare facilities in 2007. [10]
Coverage
The absence of availability of some treatments due to their viewed bad cost-effectiveness often results in what some call a "postcode lottery". [11] [12] The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the very first gatekeeper, and examine the expense efficiency of all drugs. Until they have actually released assistance on the cost and efficiency of new or expensive medications, treatments and procedures, NHS services are not likely to provide to fund courses of treatment. The same of true of the Scottish Medicines Consortium, NICE's equivalent in Scotland. [13]
There has been significant debate about the public health financing of expensive drugs, significantly Herceptin, due to its high expense and perceived minimal overall survival. The project waged by cancer victims to get the government to pay for their treatment has gone to the greatest levels in the courts and the Cabinet to get it certified. [14] [15] The House of Commons Health Select Committee criticised some drug companies for generating drugs that cost on and around the ₤ 30,000 limit that is thought about the optimum worth of one QALY in the NHS.
Private Finance Initiative
Before the concept of personal finance initiative (PFI) came to prominence, all brand-new health center structure was by convention moneyed from the Treasury, as it was believed it was best able to raise money and able to manage public sector expenditure. In June 1994, the Capital Expense Manual (CIM) was published, setting out the terms of PFI contracts. The CIM made it clear that future capital tasks (building of new facilities) had to look at whether PFI was preferable to utilizing public sector funding. By the end of 1995, 60 relatively little tasks had actually been prepared for, at a total expense of around ₤ 2 billion. Under PFI, structures were constructed and serviced by the economic sector, and then rented back to the NHS. The Labour government elected under Tony Blair in 1997 embraced PFI jobs, believing that public spending required to be cut. [16]
Under the private financing effort, an increasing number of medical facilities have actually been constructed (or rebuilt) by economic sector consortia, although the government also encouraged economic sector treatment centres, so called "surgicentres". [17] There has actually been substantial criticism of this, with a study by a consultancy company which works for the Department of Health showing that for every single ₤ 200 million invested on independently financed health centers the NHS loses 1000 physicians and nurses. The very first PFI medical facilities consist of some 28% less beds than the ones they changed. [18] As well as this, it has actually been kept in mind that the return for building and construction companies on PFI agreements might be as high as 58%, which in funding hospitals from the personal rather than public sector cost the NHS practically half a billion pounds more every year. [19]
Scandals

Several prominent medical scandals have occurred within the NHS throughout the years, such as the Alder Hey organs scandal and the Bristol heart scandal. At Alder Hey Children's Hospital, there was the unauthorised removal, retention, and disposal of human tissue, including children's organs, in between 1988 and 1995. The official report into the occurrence, the Redfern Report, revealed that Dick van Velzen, the Chair of Foetal and Infant Pathology at Alder Hey, had purchased the "unethical and unlawful removing of every organ from every kid who had had a postmortem." In action, it has been argued that the scandal brought the problem of organ and tissue contribution into the public domain, and highlighted the advantages to medical research that result. [20] The Gosport War Memorial Hospital scandal of the 1990s regarded opioid deaths. [21]
The Stafford Hospital scandal in Stafford, England in the late 2000s worried unusually high death rates among clients at the medical facility. [22] [23] Up to 1200 more clients died in between 2005 and 2008 than would be expected for the type and size of healthcare facility [24] [25] based on figures from a death design, however the final Healthcare Commission report concluded it would be misguiding to link the inadequate care to a specific number or range of numbers of deaths. [26] A public inquiry later revealed multiple instances of neglect, incompetence and abuse of patients. [27]
" Lack of independence of looking for safety and physical fitness for function"

Unlike in Scotland and Wales which have degenerated health care, NHS England is operated on behalf of the taxpayer by the UK Parliament and the Department of Health, at the head of which is the Secretary of State for Health.

The group charged in England and Wales with examining if the care delivered by the NHS is genuinely safe and healthy for function is the Care Quality Commission, or CQC. Although the CQC explains itself as the "independent regulator of all health and social care services in England" [1], it is in truth "accountable to the general public, Parliament and the Secretary of State for Health." [2] Archived 31 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine and much of its funding originates from the taxpayer. A minimum of one chairman, one chief executive [3] and a board member [4] of the CQC have been singled out for attention by a UK Secretary of State for Health.
There is for that reason the potential for a conflict of interest, as both the NHS and the CQC have the exact same leadership and both are highly susceptible to political interference.
In April 2024, Health Secretary Victoria Atkins prompted NHS England to focus on evidence and security in gender dysphoria treatment following issues raised by the Cass Review. NHS demanded cooperation from adult clinics and started a review, with Labour supporting evidence-based care. Momentum criticized limitations on gender-affirming care, while Stonewall invited the review's concentrate on children's wellness. [28] [29]
See likewise

National Health Service
List of hospitals in England
Healthcare in the United Kingdom
Private Finance Initiative
Care Quality Commission
Notes

^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "TCSR 07 - Health: The General Public Expects". theinformationdaily.com. 24 September 2007. Archived from the initial on 22 August 2014. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Schneider, Antonius; Donnachie, Ewan; Tauscher, Martin; Gerlach, Roman; Maier, Werner; Mielck, Andreas; Linde, Klaus; Mehring, Michael (9 June 2016). "Costs of collaborated versus uncoordinated care in Germany: outcomes of a regular data analysis in Bavaria". BMJ Open. 6 (6 ): e011621. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-011621. PMC 4908874. PMID 27288386.
^ "Tougher guidelines to ensure that individuals do not abuse NHS services". Medical News Today. 26 April 2004. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Health tourists could get refund". BBC News Online. 7 December 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ Jones, George (21 February 2007). "Doctors attack Blair's waiting list promise". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 25 February 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)". National Library for Health. March 2006. Archived from the original on 19 April 2013. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "So what is a QALY?". Bandolier. Archived from the original on 15 April 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Do health centers make you sick?". BBC News. 31 January 2019.
^ "Hospital deep cleaning under fire". 14 January 2008.
^ "NHS 'postcode lottery'". politics.co.uk. 9 August 2006. Archived from the initial on 7 September 2007. Retrieved 9 December 2007.
^ "Why some drugs are not worth it". BBC News. 9 March 2005. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Cancer drug rejected for NHS use". BBC News Online. 9 July 2007. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
^ "Q&A: The Herceptin judgement". BBC News. 12 April 2006. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ "Update on Herceptin appraisal". National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Archived from the initial on 13 December 2006. Retrieved 1 December 2006.
^ Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. p. 437. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
^ "New generation surgery-centres to bring out thousands more NHS operations every year". Department of Health. 3 December 2002. Archived from the initial on 5 March 2007. Retrieved 15 September 2006.
^ George Monbiot (10 March 2002). "Private Affluence, Public Rip-Off". The Spectator. Retrieved 7 September 2006.
^ PublicFinance.co.uk. "PFI hospitals 'costing NHS extra ₤ 480m a year'". Retrieved 3 December 2014.
^ Dixon, B. (19 March 2001). "Checks and balances needed for organ retention". Current Biology. 11 (5 ): R151 - R152. Bibcode:2001 CBio ... 11. R151D. doi:10.1016/ S0960-9822( 01 )00078-1. PMID 11267877.
^ "Gosport hospital deaths: Police corruption probe flawed, watchdog says". BBC News. 14 October 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
^ Nick Triggle (6 February 2013). "Stafford Hospital: Hiding errors 'must be criminal offence'". BBC. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Robert Francis QC (6 February 2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Report). House of Commons. ISBN 9780102981476. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
^ Smith, Rebecca (18 March 2009). "NHS targets 'might have led to 1,200 deaths' in Mid-Staffordshire". London: The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the initial on 21 March 2009. Retrieved 9 November 2010.
^ Emily Cook (18 March 2009). "Stafford medical facility scandal: As much as 1,200 may have passed away over "shocking" client care". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 6 May 2009.
^ "The number of people died "needlessly" at Mid Staffs". Full Fact. 7 March 2013. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
^ Sawer, Patrick; Donnelly, Laura (2 October 2011). "Boss of scandal-hit hospital escapes cross-examination". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the initial on 3 October 2011.
^ "Minister informs NHS to 'end culture of secrecy' on gender care as focus shifts to adult clinics". Morning Star. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
^ "NHS England should end 'culture of secrecy' in children's gender care". The National. 11 April 2024. Retrieved 15 April 2024.
References
Rivett, Geoffrey (1998 ). From Cradle to Grave: 50 years of the NHS. Kings Fund. ISBN 1-85717-148-9.
External links
NHS.
Further reading
Pollock, Allyson (2004 ). NHS plc: the privatisation of our healthcare. Verso. ISBN 1-84467-539-4.
Mandelstam, Michael (2006 ). Betraying the NHS: Health Abandoned. Jessica Kingsley Publishing. ISBN 1-84310-482-2.
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.