Junior medical professionals are threatening to strike once again. So what, you might say? When are they not threatening a walk-out? In the previous two years, they have taken commercial action 11 times.

This makes me truly upset. My medical union, the British Medical Association (BMA), is squandering public respect for medical professionals, mauling realities and pursuing Left-wing crusades with no regard for the cost to the health service.

Their pressing demands for higher pay make my profession, my long-lasting occupation, look tawdry, cynical and money-grubbing. There are moments when I almost feel I might rip up my subscription card in disappointment.

But it isn't just my union that is acting so disgracefully. The real culprit is the Labour federal government, whose ineptitude in union settlements given that concerning power has set off a greedy free-for-all.

Unless these outrageous demands can be brought under control, I fear the NHS could be bankrupted.

The flashpoint this month is the BMA's need for a pay increase better than the 4 per cent that was carried out on April 1 - a rise the union has actually dismissed as 'derisory'.

That 4 per cent is currently above the rate of inflation, which is presently performing at 3.5 percent. In truth, the deal provided to junior medical professionals (or 'resident physicians', as we're now expected to call them) provides substantially more, as they will get an additional ₤ 750 on top of the uplift, representing a typical increase in salary of 5.4 percent.

And it comes on top of a gigantic 22 percent average increase provided by Health Secretary Wes Streeting in 2015 in a desperate quote to put a stop to the consistent strikes, after they demanded a 30 per cent pay increase.

Their pressing demands for greater pay make my profession, my vocation, look tawdry, cynical and money-grubbing, states Dr Max Pemberton

Junior doctor members of the British Medical Association (BMA) on the picket line outside the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle in 2023

That craven capitulation by Labour didn't work, obviously - simply as surrender has proved not successful in mollifying the transportation unions, the teachers and every other militant cumulative. The BMA justifies its ongoing push for greater pay by declaring physicians are even worse off by about a quarter in genuine terms since 2009.

The chairman of the BMA council, Professor Philip Banfield, sneers at the 4 percent increase, saying it 'takes us in reverse, pushing pay remediation even further into the range,' and adds ominously: 'Nobody desires a go back to scenes of medical professionals on picket lines, however unfortunately this looks far more most likely.'

What else did anybody expect? Unions are mandated to demand as much money for their members as they can get. They don't exist to be reasonable or to embrace compromise. And when Labour shopped them off, the unions sensed weakness. Prof Banfield knows there are more concessions to be won now, more pips to be squeezed.

But the NHS is not some private, profit-making corporation, and this is not a battle in between an exploited labor force and fat cat shareholders. Our beleaguered health service is funded by all of us - and it is on its knees.

This is something most physicians can identify. Yet, over the previous decade or more, the union has been more concerned with pursuing Left-wing programs than acting in the very best interest of its members.

For example, the BMA's management has actually refused to endorse the Cass Review, commissioned by the NHS as a report into gender identity services for kids and youths.

The findings by Dr Hilary Cass, published in 2015, recommended against rushing under-18s into gender shift treatment, such as adolescence blockers, that they may later regret.

It needs to not be the BMA's function to launch into a dispute on the analysis of medical proof. That's what the Royal Colleges are for.

Sir Keir Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting. This year's pay increase comes after resident physicians were awarded rises worth 22 percent by Mr Streeting in 2015

The union has violated its bounds, and I'm seriously dissatisfied about paying my membership to an organisation that makes political declarations in my name.

These include require a ceasefire in Gaza, for example, and criticism of China for human rights abuses - as if Hamas is going to return Israeli captives or Beijing is going to stop maltreating the Uighur minority, just because a medical professional's union in the UK calls for it.

This is cheap virtue-signalling, done for no other factor than to make the BMA execs feel good about themselves.

I would admire them far more if they put their energy into fact-checking their own claims. The BMA is vulnerable to bandying about numbers that don't stand up to analysis.

A few of their figures concerning earnings and inflation have actually been exposed, utilizing data from the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Since BMA members consist of medical professionals with know-how in medical stats, it's an embarrassment to everybody.

Most of all, I dislike them for losing the general public assistance for doctors that we made at excellent personal expense during the pandemic.

It is sickening that the real regard in which the medical occupation was held simply five years ago has been changed to a big degree by cynicism and even by disapproval.

Small marvel, then, that numerous junior physicians whine that their friends with jobs in tech or banking are much better off than they are.

Junior physicians showing outside Downing Street last year throughout strike action

Medicine ought to be beyond contrast, not merely among a raft of careers measured only by the monetary benefits they bring.

This crisis has been brewing a very long time, considering that before the 2010 coalition federal government.

Tony Blair's introduction of university charges in 1998 has actually led directly to the scenario today, where practically all my junior associates are in debt by as much as ₤ 100,000 - or perhaps more.

As a result, an increasing number of younger coworkers appear to see a profession in medication as primarily transactional.

They argue that not only have they worked for their degree, however they have actually likewise bought and spent for it. And that if they can make more money by giving up the NHS for the economic sector, or perhaps by emigrating to practice abroad, for example in Australia, well, why should not they?

It's a drastically various outlook to that of my generation. As someone who was fortunate enough to have his 6 years of medical training moneyed by the state, I see my function as a psychiatrist as far more than just a task. It's my calling.

DR MAX PEMBERTON: Functioning cocaine addicts hide in plain sight, here's how to identify the signs

I am deeply pleased with what I do. Nothing else might change it or offer me the exact same degree of complete satisfaction.

I personally think that one way to solve the crisis of dissatisfied and requiring young medical professionals is to deal with student medical professionals and nurses as a diplomatic immunity.

Instead of being required to take out debilitating loans, medical students need to register to have their years of training moneyed by the state.

In return, they would carry out to work specifically within the NHS for, say, 15 years. Their financial obligation would not be a monetary one however something deeper - a responsibility to society.

Naturally, they could break this responsibility if they wanted - however then they would be liable to repay part or all the expense of their training.

This would not only make sure more junior physicians stayed in Britain, instead of emigrating, but might likewise have a deep psychological impact.

But the BMA do not bother themselves with options like this. Instead, they concentrate on political posturing and myopic and impractical pay needs. It likewise contributes to a harmful generational divide between older medical professionals and a new generation with various worths.

Unless the union concerns its senses, it will do countless harm to the NHS - the one organisation we are meant to serve.